The city council zoning commission meeting tonight was a great success. Over and over again I'm impressed with how open to creating fair legislation our City Council has been. The process has, thus far, been shockingly amicable. For 45 minutes council heard from citizens who came to show their support (no one spoke against allowing chickens). I bet there were over 50 people there. Not everyone got to speak, but everyone listened respectfully.
Cathy (a new friend that we met at the meeting) gave Andrew & me the most awesome, most hilarious, porcelain music box with a woman & a man holding a chicken. She found it at a thrift shop and brought it in case we were there tonight! I think the man looks just like Andrew ;)
(First blog contest: A special gift of eggs--once we have them--to the person who can correctly guess what tune this music box plays. Place your entries in the comments section.)
I am not exaggerating when I say this Chicken Issue has made me feel, for the first time, like a real, grown up member of this community.
(First blog contest: A special gift of eggs--once we have them--to the person who can correctly guess what tune this music box plays. Place your entries in the comments section.)
I am not exaggerating when I say this Chicken Issue has made me feel, for the first time, like a real, grown up member of this community.
Councilman Lampke asked that speakers comment on 4 probable ordinance points:
- Sex of the chickens (Hens only, everyone agrees)
- Number of chickens (Council seems to be leaning toward limiting the number of hens to somewhere between 3-5 per family to stay in accordance with rules for dogs/cats)
- Coop (Getting a permit will probably require having a coop -- otherwise the chickens can get out and would probably get eaten by predators, anyway)
- Setback from the property line (This, to my mind, is the only tricky issue. A resident can have a dog anywhere on their property, of course, and cats can roam. But in Columbus and many other chicken-allowing places there are strict rules about how far from the property line the chickens must be housed. If we have even modest property-line setbacks in the new Bexley ordinance that will probably mean that Andrew & I can't keep the chickens. We've picked the most secure spot on our property which happens to be the dog run directly abutting the property line on the side. City Council seemed inclined to search for a reasonable compromise on this issue -- possibly required setbacks from the front of the property, effectively disallowing coops in front yards.
After dinner with Dana & Brent (fellow chicken owners), Andrew & I were positively misty-eyed about the sensible workings of small town government. Not until the woman got up to talk about the goat did even one council person up there crack an ironic smile. God love 'em.
I am sorry I couldn't make the meeting, but I'm glad it went well. Nice job. Go team chicken!
ReplyDeleteThanks for the update. Great work! We are proud of all our progressive chicken-owning friends.
ReplyDeleteHorse with no name! Horse with no name!
ReplyDeleteIf /ONLY/ it was horse with no name. Have I ever told you how much I hate that song? It's my favorite song to love to hate.
ReplyDeletep.s. Saddest picture of my niece-dog ever.
"Horse with no name" is an excellent idea for a music box, but as The Chicken Lady has said, it's the wrong answer. As for the niece-dog, I think she looks downright Elizabethan. Or like Lady Gaga.
ReplyDeleteGreat job guys! Sorry I could not make it to the meeting. Sounds like it all went very well! Good luck to you and the ladies...
ReplyDelete